Events
11 May 2016: The rapporteur published an article in The parliament magazine in which she calls for EU to break deadlock over external trade law reforms.
https://www.theparliamentmagazine.eu/articles/opinion/steel-crisis-interview-cor-rapporteur-calls-eu-break-deadlock-over-external-trade
21 June 2016: The rapporteur participated in the panel discussion of a conference on the future of the steel industry in Europe organised by the Brussels office of the Austrian Federal Chamber of Labour.
http://www.akeuropa.eu/de/is-there-a-future-for-the-steel-industry-in-europe-63.html?cmpid=35&newsid=2837
27 October 2016: The rapporteur signs a letter initiated by MEP Edouard Martin (S&D/France) and co-signed by some 35 Members of the European Parliament addressed to Commission President Juncker asking urges that the proposed new non-standard methodology should be firmly founded on the provisions of Section 15 of China’s WTO Accession Protocol which will remain in force after December 2016 and must thus not lead to a de facto granting of MES to China.
http://pes.cor.europa.eu/news/pages/China-market-economy-status.aspx
9 November 2016: The rapporteur participated in the "steel action day", organised by trade unions and works councils, in Brussels.
http://www.eesc.europa.eu/?i=portal.en.group-2-news.40773
The European Commission
In its proposal for a Regulation amending Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union and Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Union (COM(2016) 721 final), and the accompanying impact assessment the European Commission addresses a number of the issues raised in the CoR opinion. In general, the European Commission recognises both the need to use a non-standard methodology in anti-dumping and anti-subsidy investigations into Chinese imports and that steel is one of the sectors most at risk from dumped Chinese goods. However, the European Commission does not propose, as did the CoR, that the best way to deal with China's status with in the WTO is not to grant it Market Economy Status (MES). Instead the European Commission proposal introduces a new methodology that aims to be country-neutral. It will apply the same way to all WTO members and will take into account significant distortions in certain countries, due to state influence in the economy.
The European Commission also recognises other issues raised in the opinion such as that while the macro economic impact of trade defence instruments are small, they may be crucial both for certain sectors or regions and that this needs to be considered when designing trade defence instruments. Furthermore, the European Commission also recognises that increased imports from China could lead to increased carbon leakage as Chinese production in general creates more CO2 emissions than production within the EU. However, the European Commission does not go as far as to say that an emission trading scheme at global level is necessary to ensure the competitiveness of European businesses. Finally, as regards the CoR's demand to become a member of the European Commission's High-level group on energy-intensive industries the European Commission has agreed that the CoR will get the status of observer.
Finally, the opinion therefore urges the Commission, when studying the economic and social impact of market economy status for China, to await the opinions of the economic stakeholders affected and to seek close coordination with other key WTO members such as the United States before making its decision on market economy status;