• 06/6/2012: a meeting with the EP rapporteur took place
• The EP draft legislative resolution from 7/12/2012 makes reference to the need for cross-border exchange of best practices and knowledge between stakeholders, public bodies and regulators should be promoted by the Commission and the Member States.
• The EP shares the concerns of the CoR about data protection and intellectual property rights when reusing public data;
• The EP also shares the CoR's view that in the case of large-scale digitalisation projects, the conclusion of agreements granting exclusive rights for a limited period of time should not be precluded;
• The EP, like the CoR, argues that setting charges over and above the marginal costs should be subject to transparent criteria and allowed in certain cases, including libraries, museums and archives;
• The EP expresses doubts as to the added value/pertinence of the establishment of an independent authority vested with specific regulatory powers regarding the re-use of public sector information.
The idea about charging marginal costs was tackled by Amendment 2 of EP report 18/07/2012
"Excessive charging hampers the re-use of public sector information and impedes the transparency and the involvement of SMEs in the improvement of the services, based on public information. Public bodies should be encouraged to guarantee, where possible, that the information charges do not exceed their marginal cost. The public sector information is an information, collected, ordered or generated for the internal purpose of the public body, and not for the reuse. Therefore, charging should apply only for the costs incurred for the reproduction and dissemination. In case of negatively affecting the financial revenues of the public entities as a result from a lower income from selling the information, these should be compensated by the central budget, which is supposed to benefit from the reduced administration and the stimulation of the business activities."